Menu
Donate Now
Foreign Lawyers Cannot Cross-Examine in India

Can Foreign Lawyers Cross-Examine Witnesses in India? The Kerala High Court Weighs In

Legal Brief · Corporate & Litigation Can Foreign Lawyers Cross-Examine Witnesses in India? The Kerala High Court Weighs In A recent ruling clarifies the boundaries of domestic litigation, reinforcing that examining witnesses before court-appointed commissioners remains strictly off-limits to foreign lawyers in India. 5 min read Published July 16, 2026 By Adv. Mamta Shukla Legal Awareness […]

Can Foreign Lawyers Cross-Examine Witnesses in India? The Kerala High Court Weighs In Read More »

Social
two-child norm Supreme Court

The Two-Child Norm Is Now on Trial Before the Supreme Court

Two-Child Norm Supreme Court Case: 5 Critical Legal Facts Constitutional Law — Panchayati Raj The Two-Child Norm Is Now on Trial Before the Supreme Court A Bench questioning a three-decade-old population policy has opened the door to a nationwide review of every two-child disqualification law still on the books. Illustration conceptualizing the legal dispute over

The Two-Child Norm Is Now on Trial Before the Supreme Court Read More »

Social
Smart Glasses, Consent, and Institutional Responsibility

The Ethics of Sight: Smart Glasses, Consent, and Institutional Responsibility

Investigative Brief · Parts I–III 2026 Guide to the Ethics of Smart Glasses & Digital Rights How modern wearable technology is quietly dismantling the social contract of public visibility — and what we must do to restore it. 8 min read Published July 8, 2026 By Adv. Mamta Shukla Legal Awareness & Digital Rights Introduction: The

The Ethics of Sight: Smart Glasses, Consent, and Institutional Responsibility Read More »

Social
Keshavananda-Bharati-v.-State-of-Kerala.

Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973): The Judgment That Saved the Indian Constitution

Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973) — The Basic Structure Doctrine Constitutional Law · Landmark Judgment Kesavananda Bharati v.State of Kerala How thirteen judges, one Mutt’s land dispute, and a single doctrine redrew the boundary between Parliament and the Constitution. Decided — 24 April 1973 Bench — 13 Judges Majority — 7 : 6

Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973): The Judgment That Saved the Indian Constitution Read More »

Social
Grandparents Can't Be Denied Visitation Rights To Meet Child

Grandparents Can’t Be Denied Visitation Rights To Meet Child

Grandparents Can’t Be Denied Visitation Rights — Madras High Court Family Law Dispatch · Custody & Guardianship Grandparents Can’t Be Denied Visitation Rights To Meet Child Affectionate relationship with them beneficial for grandkids: Madras High Court 6 min read|Custody & Guardianship When a young father passed away barely a year into his marriage, the fallout

Grandparents Can’t Be Denied Visitation Rights To Meet Child Read More »

Social
right-to-walk-supreme-court-fundamental-right

The Right to Walk: Supreme Court Declares Safe Footpaths a Fundamental Right

Constitutional Law · Supreme Court Watch The Right to Walk: Supreme Court Declares Safe Footpaths a Fundamental Right “The citizen’s fundamental right to walk on a demarcated footpath is primary and shall have priority over movement by motorised vehicles.” — Supreme Court of India MS Written by Adv. Mamta Shukla • Vijay Foundations • 20

The Right to Walk: Supreme Court Declares Safe Footpaths a Fundamental Right Read More »

Social
'Dancing Girl' educational controversy

When Textbooks Clothe History:The NCERT Dancing Girl Controversy

NCERT Dancing Girl Controversy: 1 Shocking Time Textbooks Clothed History Education & Culture When Textbooks Clothe History:The NCERT Dancing Girl Controversy A 4,500-year-old Harappan figurine was digitally altered in a Class 9 arts textbook — and historians, educators, and the public said no. Here’s why the NCERT Dancing Girl Controversy matters. MS Advocate Mamta Shukla

When Textbooks Clothe History:The NCERT Dancing Girl Controversy Read More »

Social